| | Book ShopNew | Testing Tools | Testing Books | Testing Directory | Testing JobsNew | Testing CertificationsNew | |
testingsense.com
A forum to discuss Software Testing
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Software Testing Jobs
Only Software Testing Jobs
And Nothing Else
Avoiding unnecessary testing....

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    testingsense.com Forum Index -> Integration testing
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
deepshikha



Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:05 am    Post subject: Avoiding unnecessary testing.... Reply with quote

Object-oriented systems are often built from stable components, such as commercial class libraries or re-used classes from previous successful projects. Indeed, component-based reuse is one of the fundamental goals of object-oriented development, so testing techniques must allow for it. Stable, high integrity software can be referred to as "trusted." The concept of trustedness can apply to individual modules, classes, class hierarchies, or a set of potential resolutions for dynamically bound methods, but in each case the meaning is that trusted software is assumed to function correctly and to conform to the relevant object-oriented abstraction. In addition to trusted commercial and reused software, new software becomes trusted after it has been properly tested. In structured testing, the implementation of trusted software is not tested, although its integration with other software is required to be tested.

Trusted software does not have to be tested at the module level at all, and calls internal to a trusted component do not have to be tested at the integration level. The handling of trusted modules, classes, and class hierarchies is straightforward, in that only integration testing need be performed, and even then applying the design reduction technique based on only those calls that cross a boundary of trustedness. For the case of a trusted set of potential resolutions for a dynamically bound method, only one resolution need be tested from each call site even when using the pessimistic approach for testing non-trusted code. When an automated tool is used to display trustedness information, integration tests can be stopped at the trustedness boundary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    testingsense.com Forum Index -> Integration testing All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
| | Book ShopNew | Testing Tools | Testing Books | Testing Directory | Testing JobsNew | Testing CertificationsNew | |